Firm Logo
Call for a Free Consultation215-486-0123

Michael T. van der Veen on CNN NewsNight: Analyzing the Legal Elements of the Signal Leaks Controversy

March 27, 2025

Excerpts from the March 26, 2025 discussion on CNN NewsNight:

Host: Chelsea Gabbard, John Radcliffe, who testified before Congress, would they be in jeopardy for telling things that were less than truthful?

van der Veen: The perjury statute requires the element of intent, and if there's no intent, there's no crime. And you not only have to prove that intent beyond a reasonable doubt, but when you look at their testimony of “I don't really remember,” are you going to convict her on that? You're not going to.

************************************

Host: The bigger issue has to do, maybe, with the Espionage Act. So explain to me gross negligence and who may have been either grossly negligent or negligent.

van der Veen: The Espionage Act comes from 1915. It came at the end of World War I when Woodrow Wilson, in his State of the Union, asked for that piece of legislation. It was always intended, until recent amendments, for somebody who had information and tried to use it to hurt the country. There had to be an intent to harm the nation. They did amend it to add gross negligence, but some people could even say gross negligence is unconstitutionally vague; what's negligence, what's gross negligence, what's reckless negligence? There are standards that are going to be hard to really apply, particularly in this circumstance, because nobody alleges, and I don't myself believe, that anybody [in the Signal Messenger chat] intended to hurt the country. This was certainly negligence because somebody pushed the wrong button to get the wrong guy on.

The Espionage Act isn't really meant for this circumstance; even, I believe, the amendments to it aren't really contemplating this. This was not a wide dissemination of information. First of all, it was one person added that shouldn't have been there. If you want to say it's grossly negligent, well, maybe you need 1,000 people that got added to that to be grossly negligent.

*************************************

Conclusion:

van der Veen: We really have to figure out how this doesn't happen again. They need an investigation.

Categories

Firm News

Talk to Our Experienced Legal Team Today

Fill Out the Form Below or Call Our Firm at (215) 486-0123.

Firm Logo
215-486-0123
Allentown Office609 Hamiltion St,Suite 7Allentown, PA 18101Map & Directions
Philadelphia Office1219 Spruce StPhiladelphia, PA 19107Map & Directions
Montgomery County Office411 Cherry St.Norristown, PA 19401Map & Directions
Follow Us
Make A Payment

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© All Rights Reserved. Sitemap